This is Bill. And also you, after you read the book, to all your loved ones.
It scratches all the science itches in a way that is ACCESSIBLE (important because I don't understand stuff) without sounding PANDERING (important because I like to pretend that I understand stuff and don't want to be talked down to, dammit).
As any good history book would, it starts at the beginning with the chemical(ish) composition of the pre-universe just before the Big Bang, continues through the formation of aforementioned universe and various galaxies, to the formation of our solar system and planet, to the rise of life, the history of geology and chemistry, the WTFery of quantum physics, and finally the evolution of man and a few questions about our future.
A few things I learned that I read aloud to the husband, and will therefore make you suffer the same fate:
- Proxima Centauri, the closest star to us, is 4.3 light years away, which would take you 25,000 years to reach by regular spaceship. HURRY UP AND GIVE US WARP DRIVE, SCIENCE.
- Because scientists, while being Very Smart and Able, are also Messin' With Shit They Don't Understand and Are More Often Wrong Than Right, every radiocarbon date you read today is too young by around 3% (that's a whole lotta too young when you're talking millions of years, there).
- The captain of the HMS Beagle chose Darwin as a traveling companion because he liked the shape of Darwin's nose. RELATED: Darwin never used the phrase "survival of the fittest." Middle school science teachers, you lie!
- Despite proof to the contrary that existed for decades, geologists didn't accept plate tectonics as fact until like the 70s or 80s- I can't find the highlighted section so I don't know the exact date but DAYUM. Get with it.
My biggest takeaway (aside from the science) was all gossip about the SCIENTISTS. THESE GUYS, let me tell you. Now, I come from a fairly conservative Southern Baptist background and so much of the time I'm reading about their antics and thinking- you guys sound like old, white, Southern Baptists preachers, with your NO NEWFANGLED IDEAS, PLEASE and your WE DON'T ADOPT NEW METHODS EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE PROVEN BY SCIENCE BECAUSE WE ARE JERKS SORT OF and your SCIENCE IS ALWAYS RIGHT BY WHICH I MEAN MY BRAND OF SCIENCE AND NOT THAT GUY'S. Suffice it to say, my biggest realization here was that historically speaking, scientists can be (and usually are, if Bryson is to be believed) just as fundamentalist and close-minded as the most churchy of church people, often with equally ridiculous and harmful results.
So if you want to know all the things about everything, ever, this is what you should read. However, be prepared for a healthy dose of Bryson reminding us that science itself is an evolving process and for as much as we know, there are approximately infinity things that we do not know/are wrong about.



I love Bill Bryson. Really, really love him. Possibly in a I'd-leave-my-husband-and-bear-his-children kind of way.
ReplyDeleteI wish I had read this book instead of just listening to the audio (which is great because Bill reads it), because it would have stuck with me better. But I think Bryson is the greatest genius for being able to create the most fascinating links between two seemingly unrelated things (or people).
Also, yes to the smugness of science being like the smugness of churchy people. I can barely stand to read Richard Dawkins because of his smugness.
ReplyDeleteOh my Lord-in-hot pants, Richard Dawkins. I mean, I obviously disagree with him being a Christian-type over here, but DAYUM. I can't even read a comment the man makes about the weather because he's all IT'S RAINING OBVIOUSLY THERE IS NO GOD AND IF YOU DISAGREE YOU ARE A MORON WHO TOOK MY COFFEE.
DeleteThis just made me laugh VERY hard. So true. He's not doing his team any favors by acting that way, either.
DeleteI do love me some Bill Bryson. Somehow I haven't picked this one up yet, but now I obviously need to.
ReplyDeleteDooo eeet. You want to know about the history of chemistry, DON'T YOU?
DeleteI've had this book sitting in my house for years. I bought it for my husband and he thought it was fantastic. I don't know why I haven't read it yet. I WANT to read it. Maybe it's the size...
ReplyDeleteThe size is daunting. It's a very NOT SHORT Short history.
DeleteI am going to have to get this, read it, and then make my dad read it, because I am convinced that they are long-lost BFFs. After my dad read that essay about why people drive everywhere in I'm A Stranger Here Myself, he kept talking about how someone "finally gets" him.
ReplyDeletePlus they both have bushy beards and glasses and are therefore almost twins.
I feel like Bill Bryson is every dad's BFF. Like, he has the perfect beard and probably golfs two Saturdays of the year.
DeleteI looooove this Bryson book, even though normally science type books make me sleep. But you are so right that he makes the book accessible without being pandering. And all of the scientist gossip helps.
ReplyDeleteThe science gossip is my favorite. They're so NERDY.
DeleteThis GENUINELY blew my mind when I read it. Like, all the stuff about space and how ridiculously ginormous it is? BLEW MY MIND. In a sort of 'I am terrified but also interested and please go on, Bill' sort of way.
ReplyDeleteBut yeah, love it. So. Hard.
It scares me also. All this stuff about how we're going to run into alpha centauri in a billion years and whatnot. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE PEOPLE (let's be real, there will be no more people, and if there are we will have evolved into something unrecognizable, BUT STILL)
DeleteA Walk in the Woods is definitely among my top 10 favorite books, so I should give this one another chance. I just couldn't get into it the first time I tried.
ReplyDeleteALSO, is the title of this post a reference to a certain YA author? I thought you weren't a fan?
Another ALSO, any reason you didn't give stars?
IT IS and I am not a fan, but I can't resist a play on words. It's in my BONES.
DeleteI forgot about the stars. I will say four stars out of your mom- one deduction for being very much NOT SHORT, despite the title.
I need to pick this up. Or any Bryson, really. I've only read one book of his so far, and it was certainly not a history of nearly everything. Actually, it was more of a History-of-Everything-We-Know-About-Shakespeare-Which-Is-To-Mean-a-History-of-Nothing-at-All. Oh, well. I'll have to beg my local English bookstore to order it for me.
ReplyDeleteYou're right, this was great fun. And despite not being short, it was totally engaging through the whole road trip listen we gave it. And your analysis is right on - the best parts ARE the gossip about the scientists. I love the one where the scientist (I can't remember who) flees his house when visitors approach, and only returns when they are gone. And the bit with the needle in the eye, just to see what happens? Newton was a nut.
ReplyDeleteI like to pair it that old classic, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Though some say it's a bit outmoded, it really gives a useful understanding of how scientists are frequently just as dogmatic as any religious nut.
I just finished reading "A Brief History Of Time" by Stephen Hawking which sounds a lot like the Bill Bryson one. Hawking wrote this as a kind of 'Science For Dummies' so I figured it would suit me. I love the talk of space and galaxies and event horizons and I thoroughly enjoyed it but I don't think he really understands dumbness and I got lost in his explanations a number of times. Many times. Many many times. So I'm thinking of trying the Bill Bryson one but want to know: Is it written for us nerdy-but-not-really-all-that-smart people?
ReplyDeleteBe comforted. Bryson's "A short history of nearly everything" is fundamentally simple and interesting, and remains so throughout., even though it is certainly not "short". Hawking's "A brief history of time" is certainly "brief", and starts out very simple and interesting, but then loses just about everyone who doesn't have a theoretical physics background about 60% of the way through. I tried reading it twice over several years apart, with the same result (and I am a scientist [although not physics]).
ReplyDeleteHawking is clearly brilliant as a scientist, but didn't do very goid job taking us on his travels. Bryson is brilliant as a travel writer (I think I've read most of his books), and his "A short history..." is simply that. A very interesting, engaging and thought provocative book, summed up perfectly by his opening chapter (ie flying over and wondering about our planet). How many people changed their pillows and mattresses after reading about skin cells and mites? :-)